Cutting Through Legal Farce—One Judgment at a Time!
Rule O’Flaw examines the cognitive and psychological mechanisms that underpin institutionalised corruption within government systems, revealing how institutional biases, governmental circumvention of the law, and socioeconomic inequality distort the truth and perpetuate oppression.
Episodes
Thursday Feb 05, 2026
Thursday Feb 05, 2026
Judicial opinions project an aura of inevitability, yet they often emerge from deeply indeterminate legal materials shaped by unconscious cognitive processes. Drawing on Ratzlaff v. United States, this report shows how coherence bias—operating through selective fact-filtering, evidentiary bolstering, and strategic rule selection—enables judges to craft competing yet internally coherent narratives, thereby expanding hidden discretion and complicating both rule-of-law and anti-corruption ideals.
For rule-of-law theory and anti-corruption scholarship, the analysis highlights how this hidden cognitive architecture expands de facto judicial discretion, obscures the role of ideological priors, and complicates conventional accounts of legal constraint and transparency. The report concludes by urging more psychologically realistic institutional and doctrinal responses, including greater epistemic humility in judicial writing and reforms that expose, rather than conceal, the contestable judgments that underwrite performances of certainty.
Chapters
00:00 The Mystery of Legal Certainty
01:29 The Case of Ratzlaff v United States
02:44 Understanding Coherence Bias
04:01 The Mechanics of Decision-Making
05:41 Two Flawless Stories from One Case
06:44 The Psychology Behind Judicial Hunches
08:01 The Quest for Truth in Law
No comments yet. Be the first to say something!